steve p wrote:Fantastic... that sort of story has to inspire everyone else...
steve
Inspiring indeed! And then you start examining the Records closely. From elation to puzzlement to bewilderment........
The enlistment was for 12 years, being 8 years with the Colours and 4 years with the Reserve. On enlistment in 1876 the man concerned, Robert,....
A) Lied about his age. He 'lost' over 5 years, bringing him from 32 to 26!
B) Lied about being single. He had married in 1865 and had 2 children.
C) He lived and worked in Liverpool yet enlisted in the Royal Artillery at the Fort in New Brighton.
D) Lied about his next of kin. Named his mother, "but address unknown". She was actually in the West Derby Workhouse where she died in 1881.
The record has been later amended to show Next of Kin as "Mary, wife with husband". Whatever that means? In 1881 Mary was by then living with another man as his wife using his surname and had a son by him in 1879! Remember this notable birth!
E) A daughter was born in 1877 with Robert named as the father, occupation Soldier. He was in Fermoy, Ireland when she was born and had been in the Army a little over 6 months. He was then in India from 1879 to 1884.
F) His Discharge Papers show an amendment as to his 'marital condition'. Says he married Mary Hanmer on the 27th of March 1885. That's exactly 20 years later to the day he did actually marry her. The 1885 is very clear! But, in 1891 Mary is not with her legal husband, is still using the other man's surname she used in 1881 and calls herself a widow, presumably because her common-law spouse of 1881 had died in 1884.
Anyone reading between the lines? Does the phrase 'Can of worms' spring to mind? That son born in 1879 was my maternal grandfather and Robert couldn't have fathered him despite my wildest hopes!
It's so true.. there's nowt as queer as folk!
Dickiesam