1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

For queries within the area of Lancashire between the Ribble and the Mersey.
This board covers the areas of all our Groups - Liverpool, Southport, Warrington, Skelmersdale, Leigh and Widnes.

Moderators: VicMar1, MaryA

42lingfield
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 27 Mar 2016 14:37

1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by 42lingfield »

Help please. The census shows they had 4 children who have died. How should I try to find them please?

daggers
Non Member
Posts: 2244
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 22:55

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by daggers »

How long had the parents been married?
Do you have them in the earlier censuses, 1901, 1891, 1881? The children might show up on one and not on the next.

D
M. no. 31

JohnnyO
Non Member
Posts: 481
Joined: 12 Sep 2015 10:54

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by JohnnyO »

All four children are showing on the 1901 census, living at 21 Milroy Street.
William J aged 12
Eleanor aged 9
Bessie P aged 7
Albert aged 3.

It should be fairly straightforward to go to GRO and look at the death records.

EDIT - I have just checked the 1911 census and all four children are still alive, as well as another son, Sidney.
EDIT 2 - The 1911 census shows 9 children in total, with 5 alive and 4 dead. Parents had been married 27 years so about 1887.
Names - Orrett, Orritt, Ross, McCabe, Keeley, Bullen, White, Leatham, McKeon, Bilsbarrow, Yates, Sennett, Sinnett, Traynor, Ashton

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

The couple were married at St Cyprians, 1884, Thomas Wilson/Margaret Parkinson.

The following children were baptised in the same church,

James, 1885.
Thomas, 1887.
William James, 1888.
Margaret Alice, 1890.
Eleanor, 1891.
Bessie Parkinson, 1893.
Albert, 1897.
Sidney, 1901.

Haven't found the ninth child, unlikely to have been baptised elsewhere, perhaps died before baptism was possible.
Bert

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by MaryA »

Have you used he GRO site since they made the mothers maiden name available? It's been invaluable to me in discovering the missing children. If you start two years after the marriage and search with a +/- 2 years choosing male/female alternately with just the two surnames filled in, you should be able to compile a complete list of all children, making it easier to identify those who haven't survived.

To find the deaths its easier to check freebmd and see which are marked with 0 years.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

Bert

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

I assume this is Margaret Alice,

Necropolis Cemetery, Low Hill.

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1 ... cat=329522

Thomas, Baptism & Burial address, same

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1 ... cat=329522

James, Baptism & Burial address, same

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1 ... cat=329522
Bert

JohnnyO
Non Member
Posts: 481
Joined: 12 Sep 2015 10:54

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by JohnnyO »

Bertieone wrote:I assume this is Margaret Alice,

Necropolis Cemetery, Low Hill.

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1 ... cat=329522

Thomas, Baptism & Burial address, same

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1 ... cat=329522

James, Baptism & Burial address, same

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1 ... cat=329522
Looking at the grave number for James on Familysearch, there were 2 others buried in the same grave on the same day. Would this be a public grave or pauper's
Names - Orrett, Orritt, Ross, McCabe, Keeley, Bullen, White, Leatham, McKeon, Bilsbarrow, Yates, Sennett, Sinnett, Traynor, Ashton

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

John,

No idea why, if you look on the previous page to James, there are 18 graves with the same number and more on the previous page to that, Were they burying them in trenches or is it a row number?

interesting info here,
http://www.whodoyouthinkyouaremagazine. ... t5325.html
Bert

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by MaryA »

Bertieone wrote: No idea why, if you look on the previous page to James, there are 18 graves with the same number and more on the previous page to that, Were they burying them in trenches or is it a row number?
Oh dear that is so sad, generally when there are a few of the same number down the page you expect it to be a general grave, but that does seem far too many. Both 7980 and 7982 have so many in them.

I've never come across a layout plan for this cemetery but will make an enquiry next week to see if there is any reference to it.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

Thanks Mary,

Will look forward to seeing any findings.
Bert

JohnnyO
Non Member
Posts: 481
Joined: 12 Sep 2015 10:54

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by JohnnyO »

Bertieone wrote:Thanks Mary,

Will look forward to seeing any findings.
Likewise, thanks Mary.
Names - Orrett, Orritt, Ross, McCabe, Keeley, Bullen, White, Leatham, McKeon, Bilsbarrow, Yates, Sennett, Sinnett, Traynor, Ashton

42lingfield
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 27 Mar 2016 14:37

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by 42lingfield »

Dear JohnnyO and old friends daggers, Bert and Mary A, Thank you for your replies which I shall study later. I can only be amazed at your ability to dig out things which would be beyond the abilities of ordinary mortals.

Peter.

lynne99
Non Member
Posts: 816
Joined: 20 Sep 2012 09:39

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by lynne99 »

Bert, Thanks for that link to the magazine about graves. I for one found it very interesting. I have also heard that unbaptised or still born children were put as "pillows" in other coffins to be buried.

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

lynne99 wrote: I have also heard that unbaptised or still born children were put as "pillows" in other coffins to be buried.
Yes, Lynne,

An act of kindness, unrecorded and covertly done by undertakers, who I hold responsible for much pulling out of hair and electronic wizardry flying through windows, Buggers :wink:
Bert

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by MaryA »

lynne99 wrote: I have also heard that unbaptised or still born children were put as "pillows" in other coffins to be buried.
The burials should be recorded nevertheless, but I suspect sometimes weren't.
lynne99 wrote: link to the magazine about graves.
I've also recently come across in Anfield an entry in a "Bricked" grave, sometime I'm looking forward to seeing this and checking what it looks like.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

lynne99
Non Member
Posts: 816
Joined: 20 Sep 2012 09:39

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by lynne99 »

Bert Oh Dear :roll: :roll:

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by MaryA »

Just to let you know I haven't forgotten about the search for a grave plan for the Necropolis, but it took time to identify whether there is actually one listed, still don't know how good it's going to be yet, but when I got the microfilm out, searched through it and then discovered it was the wrong film in the box :twisted: Tried a couple of other films but still the wrong ones, will try again next week hoping the staff have found the right one.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by Bertieone »

Thanks Mary,

Information from the Mersey Times, relating to pit burials.

http://www.old-merseytimes.co.uk/liverp ... yards.html

An explanation for the same grave number for many.
Bert

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: 1911 census Thomas and Margaret Wilson 88 Crown St, Lpl

Post by MaryA »

An interesting article, seems to include St Patricks - ref to my other post about Peter Roberts.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

Locked