Ancestry Problem
Moderator: MaryA
Ancestry Problem
Hi all,
Many weeks ago, the recent search history facility disappeared from my Ancestry, followed by the recent search activity, that went about a month ago.
I've contacted them by email a few times and have had return mail telling me they are looking into it, up to now, no fix.
Before I start sending Growl mails, can I ask if anyone else is experiencing this problem, have you still got use of these?
Thank you.
Many weeks ago, the recent search history facility disappeared from my Ancestry, followed by the recent search activity, that went about a month ago.
I've contacted them by email a few times and have had return mail telling me they are looking into it, up to now, no fix.
Before I start sending Growl mails, can I ask if anyone else is experiencing this problem, have you still got use of these?
Thank you.
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
Not something I can say that I've used, what do these searches come under - ie whereabouts were these links on the page?
Meantime I've sometimes found that a phone call makes more sense as they are willing to work through the problem on their own screen, not that they can always come up with an answer, but as it's a free call sometimes worth speaking to them
0-800-404-9723 (toll free) *
Monday - Friday: 9:00 am - 10:00 pm GMT
Saturday - Sunday: 9:00 am - 8:00 pm GMT
Meantime I've sometimes found that a phone call makes more sense as they are willing to work through the problem on their own screen, not that they can always come up with an answer, but as it's a free call sometimes worth speaking to them
0-800-404-9723 (toll free) *
Monday - Friday: 9:00 am - 10:00 pm GMT
Saturday - Sunday: 9:00 am - 8:00 pm GMT
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives
Re: Ancestry Problem
Thank you Mary for the reply,
It happened once before,
https://www.liverpool-genealogy.org.uk/ ... 24&t=13445
It was always available on the old system as well as the new, it saves a lot of retyping, not something I'm fond of. If you haven't got search history or recent search activity, perhaps you are also missing out.
Thank you.
It happened once before,
https://www.liverpool-genealogy.org.uk/ ... 24&t=13445
It was always available on the old system as well as the new, it saves a lot of retyping, not something I'm fond of. If you haven't got search history or recent search activity, perhaps you are also missing out.
Thank you.
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
I noticed they had gone. It was useful for being able to return to a record you had previously looked at but not saved. I hope it returns.
Blue
Blue
Member No. 8038
NIL SATIS NISI OPTIMUM
NIL SATIS NISI OPTIMUM
Re: Ancestry Problem
Thanks, Blue.
Sorry you suffer the same, at least I'm not the only one.
Anymore?
I can ask if this facility has been removed or just a temporary blip.
Sorry you suffer the same, at least I'm not the only one.
Anymore?
I can ask if this facility has been removed or just a temporary blip.
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
Just checked and find the recent search facility is still working for me. Hope they manage to sort you out.
Cheers,
Heli
Cheers,
Heli
Membership No. 7751
Looking for Blissett, Burns, Colvin, Corlett, Fazackerley, Gardner, Goldsmith, Shannon.
Looking for Blissett, Burns, Colvin, Corlett, Fazackerley, Gardner, Goldsmith, Shannon.
Re: Ancestry Problem
I never used that either; looks really useful. I was able to bring up a list of recent searches this morning, although I still don't know how to make the link appear or what situations generate it.
If it's not working it might be worth clearing your cookies to see if you can get a clean re-build.
If it's not working it might be worth clearing your cookies to see if you can get a clean re-build.
Re: Ancestry Problem
Thank you, Heli, Luxor,
Apparently the Ancestry IT department are trying to resolve the issue.
Apparently the Ancestry IT department are trying to resolve the issue.
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
Well I went looking for it and found I could add it as an item on my Home Page and thought this might be a solution ..... except it says "Your Recent Search Activity is unavailable. Please try again in a moment."
So no better than you have and would seem to be quite a long "moment".
So no better than you have and would seem to be quite a long "moment".
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives
Re: Ancestry Problem
I couldn't even find where it was to try and reinstall, if it ever comes back, no doubt we will all get it at the same time.
Annoying though, I always thought both were the most useful functions.
Annoying though, I always thought both were the most useful functions.
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
I've never even heard of this one!! Please let us know when it's back as I get quite frustrated with Ancestry when I can't find a record I know I have looked at previously. Yesterday I found a record of a soldier killed in WW1 so I set off searching on my tree and looking at numerous censuses, marriages, baptisms etc to see if it was "my" man. When I went back to the searches I couldn't for for love nor money find this particular record yet I knew I had seen it maybe 15 minutes earlier.
I ended up having to use the back arrow button on my browser and going back about 50 pages until I hit upon the record again.
In FMP it lets you see previous records you have looked at and saves them which I find very useful indeed is this the same kind of thing on Ancestry?
Also when you are looking through a list of 50 people on say a census it will highlight those you have looked at so you don't look at the same record twice after going backing to the list. I can't find this on Ancestry, maybe I need to switch something on??
I ended up having to use the back arrow button on my browser and going back about 50 pages until I hit upon the record again.
In FMP it lets you see previous records you have looked at and saves them which I find very useful indeed is this the same kind of thing on Ancestry?
Also when you are looking through a list of 50 people on say a census it will highlight those you have looked at so you don't look at the same record twice after going backing to the list. I can't find this on Ancestry, maybe I need to switch something on??
Povall Cheshire/Liverpool, Williams/Owens Caernarvon, Brown Liverpool/Cumberland/Ireland, Pritchard Liverpool, Atherton Liverpool, Banks Liverpool, Kelly IOM, Grimes/Botworth/Smith Wirral, Rice Manchester/Ireland, Lockley Manchester, Bowler Manchester.
Re: Ancestry Problem
They have problems... This is slightly different - seeing who is looking at your information - but may be connected.
http://ancestryforums.custhelp.com/post ... tId=105196
Their software is flaky. For instance, you find you can get a record with minimal data, but can't get it if you add, say, a date-of-birth. That shouldn't be. I've seen software fall over because it didn't like a blank for date-of-birth. So someone defaults the dob to, say, 1/1/1800. And it no longer collapses. But it quietly compares your entered dob to the dummy one and denies you a record that you should get! It is expensive to iron out all the wrinkles. Given a choice, I suppose we would prefer to have new records added.
http://ancestryforums.custhelp.com/post ... tId=105196
Their software is flaky. For instance, you find you can get a record with minimal data, but can't get it if you add, say, a date-of-birth. That shouldn't be. I've seen software fall over because it didn't like a blank for date-of-birth. So someone defaults the dob to, say, 1/1/1800. And it no longer collapses. But it quietly compares your entered dob to the dummy one and denies you a record that you should get! It is expensive to iron out all the wrinkles. Given a choice, I suppose we would prefer to have new records added.
Re: Ancestry Problem
It appears to be back, or a version of it.
I'm never sure if I see the same home page as others,
Click,
Search,
Search all Records,
Below the search fill in,
Recent Searches + See More, click See More Box
opens,
Recent Searches, Recently Viewed Records, Recently Viewed Data Collections
I'm never sure if I see the same home page as others,
Click,
Search,
Search all Records,
Below the search fill in,
Recent Searches + See More, click See More Box
opens,
Recent Searches, Recently Viewed Records, Recently Viewed Data Collections
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
Lucky you! my "recents" only deal with Collections, not my searches.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives
Re: Ancestry Problem
Oh wow never seen this before how useful!! Thank you Bertie.Bertieone wrote:It appears to be back, or a version of it.
I'm never sure if I see the same home page as others,
Click,
Search,
Search all Records,
Below the search fill in,
Recent Searches + See More, click See More Box
opens,
Recent Searches, Recently Viewed Records, Recently Viewed Data Collections
Another you may all be able to help with. On FMP say if you have a list of records as you look at each one then return to the list it puts a little tick besides each one as you go to show you've looked at it, so then you don't end up going back to look at the same record again but I can't find this on Anc?? Is there something I should be switching on?
Povall Cheshire/Liverpool, Williams/Owens Caernarvon, Brown Liverpool/Cumberland/Ireland, Pritchard Liverpool, Atherton Liverpool, Banks Liverpool, Kelly IOM, Grimes/Botworth/Smith Wirral, Rice Manchester/Ireland, Lockley Manchester, Bowler Manchester.
Re: Ancestry Problem
I remember the Tick on FMP from when I had it for a month, I'm not aware of anything like that on Anc, other than the search history, which is now called "Recently Viewed Records"
Not sure yet how long the records stay for, when it was search history it held about 25/30 records and one older one would drop off the bottom of the list as a new one was added to the top.
Not sure yet how long the records stay for, when it was search history it held about 25/30 records and one older one would drop off the bottom of the list as a new one was added to the top.
Bert
Re: Ancestry Problem
Thanks Bertie. I've just checked and FMP has kept records of my searches going back to 313 pages of them!! 

Povall Cheshire/Liverpool, Williams/Owens Caernarvon, Brown Liverpool/Cumberland/Ireland, Pritchard Liverpool, Atherton Liverpool, Banks Liverpool, Kelly IOM, Grimes/Botworth/Smith Wirral, Rice Manchester/Ireland, Lockley Manchester, Bowler Manchester.