We have father James who would have been born 1844 or son George William born 1882

Tried to zoom in on that badge

I didn't know if it was a WWI photograph or earlier which meant it could have been the father at some point.dickiesam wrote:Since James Powell, the father, was a railway porter in 1891, a groom ["horsekeeper"] in 1901 and apparently retired in 1910+1, I also doubt it is him.
Now you are confusing me DSdickiesam wrote: 1) The Sam Browne, its not-officer-class condition, and it isn't being worn particularly well [the buckle isn't central].
Basically, I don't think this is an officer. I think the 'accoutrements' could be part of a studio's effort to make a 'good' interesting picture to send home.MaryA wrote:Now you are confusing me DSdickiesam wrote: 1) The Sam Browne, its not-officer-class condition, and it isn't being worn particularly well [the buckle isn't central].![]()
If it was considered that this picture was of an officer then he wouldn't be the same one Katie found in the wounded list as he was a private.
daggers wrote: What a pity the photo does not show the knees!