The Mystery of Roger Dix Bond
Posted: 15 Dec 2011 13:41
Hi Everyone,
For those who love a challenge,here's meaty mystery to get your teeth into. I realise that it is out of the area, but I wonder if anyone could solve the mystery of where a friend's great uncle ended up.
The person in question, Roger Dix Bond, was born in Stafford in 1870 to George Bond and Hannah Dix Boon, the second of four children. The eldest, Clement, ended up as an apprentice in Huddersfield and the youngest child was an infant death in 1875.
It would appear that both parents passed away during the late 1870's and by the time of the 1881 census, Roger, and his younger brother, Alfred Edwin where in Stafford workhouse as pauper inmates.
I know that Alfred was with his aunt, his mother's sister in 1891 and believe that he went on to marry a Sarah Lord in 1905. Alfred seems to change his middle name between Edwin and Edward. However, there is no trace of the whereabouts of Roger after 1881 as he does not appear on any GRO index after this date. Given his distinctive second name you would expect him to stand out like the proverbial sore thumb.
Any help in solving this mystery would be appreciated
Regards
Frank (7748)
For those who love a challenge,here's meaty mystery to get your teeth into. I realise that it is out of the area, but I wonder if anyone could solve the mystery of where a friend's great uncle ended up.
The person in question, Roger Dix Bond, was born in Stafford in 1870 to George Bond and Hannah Dix Boon, the second of four children. The eldest, Clement, ended up as an apprentice in Huddersfield and the youngest child was an infant death in 1875.
It would appear that both parents passed away during the late 1870's and by the time of the 1881 census, Roger, and his younger brother, Alfred Edwin where in Stafford workhouse as pauper inmates.
I know that Alfred was with his aunt, his mother's sister in 1891 and believe that he went on to marry a Sarah Lord in 1905. Alfred seems to change his middle name between Edwin and Edward. However, there is no trace of the whereabouts of Roger after 1881 as he does not appear on any GRO index after this date. Given his distinctive second name you would expect him to stand out like the proverbial sore thumb.
Any help in solving this mystery would be appreciated
Regards
Frank (7748)