Walton-on-the-hill (detached). Why?
Posted: 01 Mar 2014 15:50
Hi all,
I have received a letter from one of our members in Australia, raising a very valid question. She has asked it before (in 2005) but nobody seems to have been able to answer, so she thought that she would try again. The member in question doesn't have a computer/email, so I thought I would ask here on the Forum and maybe include the answer with her letter in the next edition of the journal.
The question is: Why does our map of the West Derby Hundred (and it's not the only one) show Walton-on-the-hill in two places (the more northerly location shown as "detached")? I have seen reference to one being a village and the other a "township" but cannot easily see an explanation for why the two places bear the same name, despite a significant distance separating them.
Does anybody know the answer to this curio?
Cheers.
Mike.
I have received a letter from one of our members in Australia, raising a very valid question. She has asked it before (in 2005) but nobody seems to have been able to answer, so she thought that she would try again. The member in question doesn't have a computer/email, so I thought I would ask here on the Forum and maybe include the answer with her letter in the next edition of the journal.
The question is: Why does our map of the West Derby Hundred (and it's not the only one) show Walton-on-the-hill in two places (the more northerly location shown as "detached")? I have seen reference to one being a village and the other a "township" but cannot easily see an explanation for why the two places bear the same name, despite a significant distance separating them.
Does anybody know the answer to this curio?
Cheers.
Mike.