Louisa Maud McQuinn - Christening record, but no BMD
Posted: 17 Nov 2013 16:57
Hi All,
This is a strange one!
I've stumbled upon a (Liverpool) Christening record for a child named Louisa Maud McQuinn on Ancestry. Her parents were Alfred and Julia McQuinn - my great grandparents. This was a surprise, and I wasn't aware that Louisa Maud existed! Unfortunately I'm not subscribed to Ancestry at the moment, so I can't access the record to find any more info.
Alfred & Julia were married in 1894 (both aged 22). A daughter (Julia Mabel) was born to them during the year of their marriage: she died aged 5.
I've searched for Louisa Maud McQuinn in the BDMs of various websites, using 1894 year as a starting point, but returned no matches.
Is it possible that Louisa Maud was stillborn (perhaps the stillborn twin of Julia Mabel?) and this is why neither her birth nor death were recorded? Although having said that: would a stillborn baby have been christened?
Any advice/suggestions would be welcomed!
This is a strange one!
I've stumbled upon a (Liverpool) Christening record for a child named Louisa Maud McQuinn on Ancestry. Her parents were Alfred and Julia McQuinn - my great grandparents. This was a surprise, and I wasn't aware that Louisa Maud existed! Unfortunately I'm not subscribed to Ancestry at the moment, so I can't access the record to find any more info.
Alfred & Julia were married in 1894 (both aged 22). A daughter (Julia Mabel) was born to them during the year of their marriage: she died aged 5.
I've searched for Louisa Maud McQuinn in the BDMs of various websites, using 1894 year as a starting point, but returned no matches.
Is it possible that Louisa Maud was stillborn (perhaps the stillborn twin of Julia Mabel?) and this is why neither her birth nor death were recorded? Although having said that: would a stillborn baby have been christened?
Any advice/suggestions would be welcomed!