

Hi all; thanks, I saw both Smith entries. I didn't know if the mother would be classed as Smith as that was her 'husbands' name because she had left him at the time of the birth and was an unmarried mother. No record of any Philson in the tree, but just looked at FreeBMD and a Walter N Smith married a Monica M Philson in Q2 1915, which would tie in with a 1916 birth for either Smith. There does not appear to be a Clifford Smith marrying a female Smith anywhere though on FreeBMD.luxor wrote:Familysearch show two Walter Smiths born in West Derby in 1916; Walter G Smith, mother Philson and Walter Smith, mother Smith.
They show the death of a Walter Smith - born 1916 - in West Derby in 1917.
https://familysearch.org/search/record/ ... 1916-1916~
Mine tooMaryA wrote:The only thing I can think of is that female Groves may have been the mother of George and Alice Parry was the mother of Dora May.
Head still hurting.
This looks very much like a cut and copied extract from a page of entries, and the whole sheet is completed by one person. I was looking for the family in the 1901 census, but not having much joy with that either!Bertieone wrote:Does the informant of the birth actually sign anything (7)?
Only sight of the original signatures would help determine if they are the same person.
Notice on the copies, signature for informant, one had signed Alice Smith, the other A Smith.
We don't receive the original registration do we?
Now and again from a local office, but not alwaysBertieone wrote: We don't receive the original registration do we?
Thanks Mary,MaryA wrote:Now and again from a local office, but not alwaysBertieone wrote: We don't receive the original registration do we?
In fact both images I have uploaded are extracts. The wording being "certified to be a true copy of an entry in the certified copy of a register of births". So, a copy of a copy of the original! Without seeing sight of the original, there is no way of comparing handwriting. Is there any way of seeing these originals anywhere I wonder? Maybe the elderly aunt has inherited them from her father, George Clifford Smith, although she has never mentioned itBertieone wrote:Thanks Mary,MaryA wrote:Now and again from a local office, but not alwaysBertieone wrote: We don't receive the original registration do we?
If Dora May's certificate is a copy from a page of entries? and clearly done by the same hand, where is the original signature of the informant?
I'm assuming there is one, otherwise the column 7 is misleading.
I appear unfortunately to be confusing this with marriage certificates, assuming that birth and death certificates were treated the same but I'm doubting myself now.Bertieone wrote:where is the original signature of the informant?
No copy from the GRO can ever be a copy of the original. All registers, and I'm assuming it still happens in a similar manner, are copied by the Registrar each quarter and sent to the GRO for their uses. What you have is a copy from the GRO Register, the original being kept by the local office.Johnnyo wrote:The wording being "certified to be a true copy of an entry in the certified copy of a register of births". So, a copy of a copy of the original!
Thanks Mary. At least Irish Ancestors are letting up see the copy of the copy of the original certificates for free. I've found it really useful and it's saved me a fortune if they were chatgingMaryA wrote:I appear unfortunately to be confusing this with marriage certificates, assuming that birth and death certificates were treated the same but I'm doubting myself now.Bertieone wrote:where is the original signature of the informant?
No copy from the GRO can ever be a copy of the original. All registers, and I'm assuming it still happens in a similar manner, are copied by the Registrar each quarter and sent to the GRO for their uses. What you have is a copy from the GRO Register, the original being kept by the local office.Johnnyo wrote:The wording being "certified to be a true copy of an entry in the certified copy of a register of births". So, a copy of a copy of the original!
Thanks to Bert for reminding me about this thread. Mary, on reading this again, this is the family! All of my wife's family had previously looked at me blankly when I talked undertakers and probably why I discounted that, together with another year's worth of research. Maybe that as he was in the 1939 register as a coachman or groom, he was working with horses in the undertaker's?JohnnyO wrote: ↑12 Jan 2017 20:22Hi Mary, many thanks for looking this up, I never did get a chance to get to the library with work commitments. The Wade side is correct, as Esther is Thomas Stanley Wade's sister, and the father Thomas Smith was a baker and died in 1929. My wife does not remember her grandfather being an undertaker's agent. Another blow is the witness Robert Smith, as there is no one in the family with that nameMaryA wrote:Sorry no image as the camera on my phone has died a death and the entry was in the original registers, not on microfilm.
16 November 1935 St Cuthbert, Everton
Thomas Stanley Wade, 30, Bachelor, Baker of 14 Bagnall Street
Father Thomas Wade (Deceased) Baker
Dora May Smith, 26, Spinster, 83 Wye Street
Father Clifford Smith, Undertakers Agent
Both signed their names
Witnesses Robert H? Smith and Esther F Wade![]()
So many points lost in all this, please can you tell me which Register you mean for this?